As I said before, Ghostbusters is a slow and steady movie. Star Trek had a show and 3 movies in the 2000's, so yes it's going to make more money.
I'm not sure that makes sense.
Star Trek has remained current from its tv shows and movies, so it's guaranteed to make more money than something that hasn't had anything new in almost thirty years.
If you're saying that in the sense that a long running media franchise has greater grace than one with fewer productions due to number of installments, then I suppose you could argue that the fan base might be more likely to show up to the latest installment irrespective of the reviews. But, I wouldn't say that guarantees a poorly recieved movie in smaller franchise makes less than one from a larger franchise. It's more likely that an installment of a larger franchise is not going to be poorly received because it can more easily meet expectations.
Why do you hate women Scoob?
Why do you hate them so much?
YAY PEOPLE CARE ENOUGH ABOUT MAKING HILLARY LOOK BAD TO FORGET THAT THEY'RE HELPING TRUMP GET ELECTED!
They should have pushed a better candidate.
We deserve it.
I say this as someone who has a high risk of being directly affected by Trump's presidency if it occurs.
The Democratic party is to blame here. They were aware of the risks and pushed a horrible candidate, and F**ked who people that will actually be alive to deal with problems in 20 years actually wanted.
And like rebellious children, people would rather be F**ked by those problems than vote for a candidate they don't like.
Look, I get it for junkies & pot heads & people who don't even know what laws get passed because they don't care. Been there, done that.
But I can't believe when I see people who know they are going to be screwed and would rather accept it than swallow their pride & stfu for 5 minutes so the democratic party doesn't end up not even having a nominee on the ballot.
You're not going to have any problems under a President Trump so long as you're here legally and not under false pretenses.
If you're an illegal then you're part of the problem, and your purge from our Great Land will be cause for righteous jubilee.
Most people in general are incapable of holding rational political discourse.
Exactly what I was going to say. Glad to see that the first person to respond to this thread already said it.
Congrats, you made the same reading fail I did. this thread is about having political sex. Kinda like the sex Julia and Winston had in 1984. Passionate mating for no other purpose than to deliver a f**k you to Big Brother... god that's depressing.
That, too. Also its central theme was bullshit. I could play all the games and watch all the shows with an infinite lifespan! So yeah I'd never run out of things to do and my life would always have meaning.
Bach's Almighty is all-seeing, but at the end of the day, it's a sight-based power. So Kyoka Suigetsu could still fool him. It doesn't matter if Bach can see every grain of sand if Aizen can intercept that vision fullstop.
You know if Tosen was still alive, he would've been handy here.
I read this Kakashi thing from the manga many years ago, as in, during the era of the first generation of ASMB'ers, and I was thinking that it went on for a little bit, so I'm surprised they managed to get it into 2 episodes. But nothing seems to have been left out from what I can remember. I don't think Rin died. So that makes me wonder where she is.
I'm still not convinced he's gay. A lot of rapists/child molesters do it for the feeling of power they get over another life, rather than the sexual satisfaction. He seems one that loves dominating others, no matter the situation or gender.
he might not be, Togashi and his wife seem to both be Bi(they both love same sex romance and include it in their Mangas occasionally) so it would be strange for them to make a Gay character a pedo in this series
They wrote about gay/bi characters, so clearly they must be gay/bi themselves. rolls eyes
You've already been told he's not a gay pedo countless times...
straight people don't usually write Gay characters unless they have a Gay sibling they feel bad for, or a Gay friend, unless both of them have a Gay relative they feel they've wronged it would be strange for them to write a Gay character while not themselves being somewhere in the LGBT acronym
They probably know someone who is gay or have known someone who is gay by sheer statistical probability. That said, there are people who do charitable causes even if the cause doesn't affect them or anyone they know, and those people should be given all the more credit for that, since they decided to help without the issue coming to their front door. Of course, a writer might have difficulty writing about a certain type of person if they have no personal experience with them. But again, it's pretty much impossible for anyone to not ever have known a gay person. Also you know how writers always like to be "inclusive" and put in LGBT stuff to get progressive brownie points and pat themselves on the back. Writers will also make gay stories for Oscar-bait. I'm not saying that's the case with them here, but it's a possibility. The point is, there's many reasons for somebody to write LGBT storylines besides the writer themselves being gay. You've officially gone from turning characters gay to turning real people gay. I don't know how much more ridiculous you can get.
he was a Gay devil who did perverted things, wore Drag and switched back and between a sissy and manly voice for humor and he was meant to represent sexual depravity and disgust
basically he was Puri Puri Prisoner
I think you're reading too much into a kids show. Him was just supposed to be a funny character. They made the Devil into a girly-man. It's supposed to be funny because the badass Devil wears women's clothes, etc. That was the extent of it.