Reply to Saddy - Message ID#: 64174671
03-21-2012 10:55 AM
That's the thing, the whole point of the "stand your ground" deal as I understand it is there are no exceptions. Save for if it's standing your ground committing a crime.
But isn't murder a crime?
It's not murder if you're defending yourself.
What about excessive force?
The force isn't necessarily excessive if it was in defence.
And that's where my brain explodes. Another stupid, tautological law that lets idiots get away with murder.
Reply to Rasputin0070 - Message ID#: 64174793
03-21-2012 10:59 AM
Reply to Rasputin0070 - Message ID#: 64174793
03-21-2012 11:21 AM
Reply to Saddy - Message ID#: 64174929
03-21-2012 12:09 PM
Reply to Heinekenrana - Message ID#: 64175373
03-21-2012 12:13 PM
Reply to Buddyroe274 - Message ID#: 64115409
03-21-2012 12:45 PM
Buddyroe274 wrote:A lot has changed, but some things never do........Had the roles been reversed it would be a media frenzy, and the kid would be a national hero........Odd the way things are, but it doesn't even faze me anymore.
Well thank God it continues to faze some of us. You know, don't quietly give into that "Good Night" as it were. Fight the Good Fight, let not anarchy take us unaware or apathetic.
Apathy is death.
Reply to Rasputin0070 - Message ID#: 64174793
03-21-2012 02:42 PM
Reply to Glodson - Message ID#: 64177121
03-21-2012 02:58 PM
From what I heard this morning they're also petitioning for the resignation of the police chief as well.
This is all just so bloody crazy.
I can't imagine being the dad of this kid.
Reply to Rasputin0070 - Message ID#: 64177367
03-21-2012 03:03 PM
Reply to The_Pirate-King - Message ID#: 64115107
03-21-2012 03:57 PM
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2012/03/republican-
-davidoatkins.html
*sigh*
Reply to Glodson - Message ID#: 64177447
03-21-2012 04:02 PM
Reply to FussyMcFusserson - Message ID#: 64178163
03-21-2012 04:07 PM
FussyMcFusserson wrote:http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2012/03/republican-
base-exposed-by
-davidoatkins.html
*sigh*
Sigh is right...
Reply to The_Pirate-King - Message ID#: 64115107
03-21-2012 04:13 PM
http://shakespearessister.blogspot.com/2012/03/wed
nd_21.html
Lots o' links here . . . . .
Reply to Saddy - Message ID#: 64174671
03-21-2012 04:15 PM
Reply to The_Pirate-King - Message ID#: 64178395
03-21-2012 04:24 PM
It was my understanding that Neighborhood Watch was not supposed to be a single person, or an armed person - shouldn't that be enough to cast suspicion?
Reply to FussyMcFusserson - Message ID#: 64178163
03-21-2012 04:29 PM
Reply to Renoite - Message ID#: 64178497
03-21-2012 04:31 PM
Reply to westpark - Message ID#: 64116127
03-21-2012 04:32 PM
westpark wrote:I heard the other day that this guy Zimmerman is hispanic.
Where as the initial reports said he was white. Is that true?
He is probably White Hispanic.
Ugh, the reason they aren't holding him, besides the blatant racial profiling and the racist police officers. Is because he was probably claiming self defense. And all of the other white racist neighbors just didn't want to side against this ... "Person"... ugh....
I wasn't there though, I don't have any of the facts. But the fact the man had to kill this kid, something is wrong with the picture, could have just wounded him if you had a fire arm.
Reply to The_Pirate-King - Message ID#: 64178395
03-21-2012 04:43 PM
The_Pirate-King wrote:
As I understand "stand your ground", it removes any burden from a shooter to find a non-violent or non-lethal solution to a threat (like running away). Of course, there has to be an actual threat in the first place, initiated by someone else; however, since nobody saw how the confrontation started, it will likely be difficult to convict Zimmerman.
Reply to Glodson - Message ID#: 64178717
03-21-2012 04:49 PM
I agree there. You're right, there's too much evidence to the contrary for it to possibly be seen as self defense. As long as the feds bring along a competent lawyer, it should work out.
Glodson wrote:
The_Pirate-King wrote:
As I understand "stand your ground", it removes any burden from a shooter to find a non-violent or non-lethal solution to a threat (like running away). Of course, there has to be an actual threat in the first place, initiated by someone else; however, since nobody saw how the confrontation started, it will likely be difficult to convict Zimmerman.
I disagree. There's evidence enough to show that Zimmerman provoked any encounter. The call with Martin's friend indicates that Martin had no desire to confront Zimmerman, and was actively trying to elude the man. The accounts of people living nearby suggest that even if Martin started the attack, he had quit attacking. So unless the "stand your ground" law allows for the defender to pursue and attack the attacker even after the attacker has given up the fight, the fact that Martin was screaming for help indicates that Zimmerman pressed the attack.
All the mounting evidence shows that Zimmerman was the aggressor, and that he kept at it. Getting a murder conviction should be easy. The botched police investigation is the hurdle. But failing murder, manslaughter should be easy as well.
If this man gets away with it, there should be some serious consequences for all the officers, and the department, involved.
Reply to The_Pirate-King - Message ID#: 64178757
03-21-2012 04:54 PM
Reply to candiegrlcane - Message ID#: 64178211
03-21-2012 04:57 PM
Reply to candiegrlcane - Message ID#: 64178807
03-21-2012 07:55 PM
Reply to Mjöllnir - Message ID#: 64180533
03-21-2012 07:57 PM
Mjöllnir wrote:
Yeah but dogs are cute.
-_-
........ click.. HERE
Reply to candiegrlcane - Message ID#: 64180565
03-21-2012 08:07 PM
TM & © 2013 Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
AdultSwim.com is part of Turner Entertainment Digital which is part of the Turner Sports & Entertainment Digital Network.