02-29-2012 05:48 PM - edited 02-29-2012 05:51 PM
...calling college students ####. You silly man you.
http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201202290008
In other news, this person still has a public forum.
Reply to Icarus27k - Message ID#: 63908651
02-29-2012 06:00 PM
Reply to Icarus27k - Message ID#: 63908651
02-29-2012 10:24 PM
Icarus27k wrote:...calling college students ####. You silly man you.
http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201202290008
In other news, this person still has a public forum.
I'd be suing his fat ass off for defamation of character, slander, libel, and God knows what else.
Reply to Icarus27k - Message ID#: 63908651
03-01-2012 07:19 AM
Icarus27k wrote:...calling college students ####. You silly man you.
http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201202290008
In other news, this person still has a public forum.
He makes too much money. They can't get rid of him because he's a company. Too bad its a company that speaks bull####. I think its crazy he turned out to be a pillhead. I never expected that from him.
Reply to Icarus27k - Message ID#: 63908651
03-01-2012 08:50 AM
Typical behavior of the fat druggie conservative nutjob. He's just like Ann Coulter, an attention ####. They should get married and then sterilized so they can't spawn any horrendous monstrosities.
Reply to LadyMiseryAli - Message ID#: 63916653
03-01-2012 02:58 PM
i think this
http://www.theonion.com/articles/i-dont-even-want-
more,11521/
will shed some light on the subject. that is, if light could escape the gravity well of that giant preening fat ass.
Reply to Icarus27k - Message ID#: 63908651
03-01-2012 03:26 PM
Reply to westpark - Message ID#: 63916357
03-01-2012 03:28 PM
westpark wrote:
Icarus27k wrote:...calling college students ####. You silly man you.
http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201202290008
In other news, this person still has a public forum.
He makes too much money. They can't get rid of him because he's a company. Too bad its a company that speaks bull####. I think its crazy he turned out to be a pillhead. I never expected that from him.
Whyever not? ![]()
Reply to Icarus27k - Message ID#: 63908651
03-01-2012 11:23 PM
Ah yes, the plight of the brave future lawyer and dedicated Obamunist Sandra Fluke.
Limbaugh calling her a disparaging name isn't appropriate, but Ms. Fluke isn't exactly
pure as the driven snow in this either. This really is nothing more than media matters
trying to gin up some kind of controversy to distract attention from Obama's failing policies
and unpopular positions.
Reply to Jingai - Message ID#: 63926209
03-01-2012 11:26 PM
In fact, that law student is pure evil. Evil!
Reply to Jingai - Message ID#: 63926209
03-01-2012 11:41 PM
Jingai wrote:
Ah yes, the plight of the brave future lawyer and dedicated Obamunist Sandra Fluke.
Limbaugh calling her a disparaging name isn't appropriate, but Ms. Fluke isn't exactly
pure as the driven snow in this either. This really is nothing more than media matters
trying to gin up some kind of controversy to distract attention from Obama's failing policies
and unpopular positions.
So? ![]()
I guess like Rush, if you pay for her contraception so she can have sex, you want to watch her having sex.
It amazes me the way away you people will go out of your way to validate loathsome despicable fuuuuuudgetards like Limbaugh. And really, even if a woman has sex once a year, she has the #### right to be able to get contraception to avoid getting pregnant.
Reply to Jingai - Message ID#: 63926209
03-02-2012 12:11 AM
Reply to Master-Debater131 - Message ID#: 63927055
03-02-2012 12:14 AM
Go to another planet please.
Reply to Master-Debater131 - Message ID#: 63927055
03-02-2012 12:19 AM
Master-Debater131 wrote:
I like his other idea better.
If they get the contraception we get sex tapes
If people are going to get a handout for something they dont actually need then the people who arent getting that handout should get something as well.
What handout? This is about employers not allowing insurance THAT THE EMPLOYEES PAY INTO to pay for contraception. And you ARE getting something: less people on welfare. Didn't think about that, did you?
Reply to Master-Debater131 - Message ID#: 63927055
03-02-2012 12:28 AM
I almost forgot about this.
Someone did the math about how much sex a student must be having to incure the costs that she says they are incuring.
How much sex are they having?
Reply to FussyMcFusserson - Message ID#: 63927155
03-02-2012 12:28 AM
Did you ever think that women shouldn't be dating losers who are too cheap to pay for their birth control expenses?
Reply to FussyMcFusserson - Message ID#: 63926493
03-02-2012 12:29 AM
FussyMcFusserson wrote:
Jingai wrote:
Ah yes, the plight of the brave future lawyer and dedicated Obamunist Sandra Fluke.
Limbaugh calling her a disparaging name isn't appropriate, but Ms. Fluke isn't exactly
pure as the driven snow in this either. This really is nothing more than media matters
trying to gin up some kind of controversy to distract attention from Obama's failing policies
and unpopular positions.
So?
I guess like Rush, if you pay for her contraception so she can have sex, you want to watch her having sex.
It amazes me the way away you people will go out of your way to validate loathsome despicable fuuuuuudgetards like Limbaugh. And really, even if a woman has sex once a year, she has the #### right to be able to get contraception to avoid getting pregnant.
Where exactly did I say I wanted to watch her have sex?
I didn't validate Limbaugh's comments either, I do not agree with him calling her a derogatory name.* I clearly stated such
in my earlier post.
*Highlighted for reference.
Reply to Jingai - Message ID#: 63927381
03-02-2012 12:36 AM
Jingai wrote:
FussyMcFusserson wrote:
Jingai wrote:
Ah yes, the plight of the brave future lawyer and dedicated Obamunist Sandra Fluke.
Limbaugh calling her a disparaging name isn't appropriate, but Ms. Fluke isn't exactly
pure as the driven snow in this either. This really is nothing more than media matters
trying to gin up some kind of controversy to distract attention from Obama's failing policies
and unpopular positions.
So?
I guess like Rush, if you pay for her contraception so she can have sex, you want to watch her having sex.
It amazes me the way away you people will go out of your way to validate loathsome despicable fuuuuuudgetards like Limbaugh. And really, even if a woman has sex once a year, she has the #### right to be able to get contraception to avoid getting pregnant.
Where exactly did I say I wanted to watch her have sex?
I didn't validate Limbaugh's comments either, I do not agree with him calling her a derogatory name.* I clearly stated such
in my earlier post.
*Highlighted for reference.
Hey, you agreed with Rush on one stupid point, I thought you agreed with the other. Don't blame me if you can't keep up.
Reply to Master-Debater131 - Message ID#: 63927343
03-02-2012 12:38 AM
Master-Debater131 wrote:I almost forgot about this.
Someone did the math about how much sex a student must be having to incure the costs that she says they are incuring.
How much sex are they having?
So?
Reply to Master-Debater131 - Message ID#: 63927343
03-02-2012 12:38 AM
Master-Debater131 wrote:I almost forgot about this.
Someone did the math about how much sex a student must be having to incure the costs that she says they are incuring.
How much sex are they having?
That someone is a moronic old guy from a conservative blog talking on the subject of women's health.
Reply to chelydra - Message ID#: 63927351
03-02-2012 12:38 AM
Reply to Master-Debater131 - Message ID#: 63927577
03-02-2012 12:42 AM
Master-Debater131 wrote:
Or....you know......not having sex 2.74 times a day..........
Honestly how hard is it to have a little bit of self control.
So you agree with Rush.
Reply to Master-Debater131 - Message ID#: 63927055
03-02-2012 12:45 AM - edited 03-02-2012 12:54 AM
Master-Debater131 wrote:
I like his other idea better.
If they get the contraception we get sex tapes
If people are going to get a handout for something they dont actually need then the people who arent getting that handout should get something as well.
First of all, the internet doesn't need more bad amateur porn.
The interesting thing about her testimony is that it doesn't really make sense when you examine it more closely.
That is why I included a link to her actual testimony, in order to ensure accuracy. She asserted that students at Georgetown
were suffering financial hardship due to a lack of contraception coverage. There are a few questions about that which come to mind. First, Georgetown is roughly 40k a year for law school. Even on public scholarships, that is still a lot of money,
next to which one thousand dollars a year seems comparatively small as a source of financial burden.
Second, planned parenthood seems to have no difficulty in obtaining or distributing contraception,* and they do so at
a rate much lower than the thousand dollars a year which Ms. Fluke quoted. Surely this must be a fluke. Third, there are
several pharmacies withing walking distance of Georgetown which offer contraceptive over the counter products. Figuring a cost of roughly one dollar per device, a thousand dollars of coverage a year would equate to two devices per day, with a hat trick once a week. Finally, for those who are interested, the District of Columbia Department of Health will distribute, free of charge, condoms and lubricant.
* Search results from Planned Parenthood on the various costs associated with the contraceptive services they provide.
Individual products will require use of links listed to determine individual costs.
Edited to retract a flippant statement.
The cost of one dollar per profilactic used is from the Planned Parenthood website.
Reply to FussyMcFusserson - Message ID#: 63927531
03-02-2012 12:51 AM
FussyMcFusserson wrote:
Jingai wrote:
FussyMcFusserson wrote:
Jingai wrote:
Ah yes, the plight of the brave future lawyer and dedicated Obamunist Sandra Fluke.
Limbaugh calling her a disparaging name isn't appropriate, but Ms. Fluke isn't exactly
pure as the driven snow in this either. This really is nothing more than media matters
trying to gin up some kind of controversy to distract attention from Obama's failing policies
and unpopular positions.
So?
I guess like Rush, if you pay for her contraception so she can have sex, you want to watch her having sex.
It amazes me the way away you people will go out of your way to validate loathsome despicable fuuuuuudgetards like Limbaugh. And really, even if a woman has sex once a year, she has the #### right to be able to get contraception to avoid getting pregnant.
Where exactly did I say I wanted to watch her have sex?
I didn't validate Limbaugh's comments either, I do not agree with him calling her a derogatory name.* I clearly stated such
in my earlier post.
*Highlighted for reference.
Hey, you agreed with Rush on one stupid point, I thought you agreed with the other. Don't blame me if you can't keep up.
I don't seem to recall agreeing with Rush on any point. In fact, I seem to have, three times now, repudiated Rush for
his disparaging remarks. Rush has not made any other points that are posted in the OP that I replied to.
Instead of assuming, perhaps you should simply read what is posted, and ask questions in a polite tone,
absent the partisan vitriol and ad hominems.
Reply to Jingai - Message ID#: 63927733
03-02-2012 12:51 AM
Jingai wrote:
She asserted that students at Georgetownwere suffering financial hardship due to a lack of contraception coverage. There are a few questions about that which come to mind. First, Georgetown is roughly 40k a year for law school. Even on public scholarships, that is still a lot of money,
Comparing education expenses with medical expenses. I'm sure this makes sense to some people.
TM & © 2013 Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
AdultSwim.com is part of Turner Entertainment Digital which is part of the Turner Sports & Entertainment Digital Network.