Reply to KillerDevdasi - Message ID#: 56938758
10-14-2010 12:35 AM
...Both?
KillerDevdasi wrote:
the_shotgun_rhetoric wrote:Pfft, she could be f--king Inuit for all I care. I'd hit it.
is that because you think she's hot...or just because she owns a va.g and you have no other standards otherwise?
Reply to SaugusHagar - Message ID#: 56932872
10-14-2010 12:36 AM - edited 10-14-2010 12:58 AM
SaugusHagar wrote:
Buddyroe360 wrote:
She's part Indian, and if the other chicks werent as bordeline hot as she was then she deserved to win.
Seriously.......Who gives a shet.according to the critics it was the wrong part.
its unfortunate...I bet they wouldn't have any problem with halfsies like Katrina Kaif or Rhona Mitra or Gabrielle Anwar (though I wouldn't call her very pretty...she obviously tans too much)
Hell, some people from Kashmir are that white...don't they count as "indian"?
Reply to MusketBoned - Message ID#: 56938854
10-14-2010 12:55 AM
MusketBoned wrote:...Both?
KillerDevdasi wrote:
the_shotgun_rhetoric wrote:Pfft, she could be f--king Inuit for all I care. I'd hit it.
is that because you think she's hot...or just because she owns a va.g and you have no other standards otherwise?
well..hotness usually implies vag ownership.
vag ownership does not always imply hotness.
Reply to KillerDevdasi - Message ID#: 56939164
10-14-2010 12:57 AM
Reply to KillerDevdasi - Message ID#: 56938758
10-14-2010 12:59 AM
I am not Zeni just because I post in this folder now. I have standards. She's quite attractive.
Reply to MusketBoned - Message ID#: 56939184
10-14-2010 01:00 AM
MusketBoned wrote:
Yeah, well she's cute. I've no clue of the intention of your post, but I've every clue of the intention of my post.
I forgot what my point was.
but I still like how sexist I just sounded right there...I'm sticking with that line.
Reply to KillerDevdasi - Message ID#: 56939232
10-14-2010 01:09 AM
Reply to MusketBoned - Message ID#: 56939388
10-14-2010 01:14 AM
MusketBoned wrote:
I think you're just jealous you can't look as good in a bikini under overalls (wtf).
Ans maybe of light-skinned Indians. By the way, how are things in India?
its for the days she wants to walk on the beach and weed the garden in the same day.
Reply to the_shotgun_rhetoric - Message ID#: 56939214
10-14-2010 01:16 AM
the_shotgun_rhetoric wrote:I am not Zeni just because I post in this folder now. I have standards. She's quite attractive.
just checking ![]()
still better than being a part of the "All Indians are ugly" camp.
Reply to KillerDevdasi - Message ID#: 56939464
10-14-2010 01:19 AM
Reply to NaBraniel - Message ID#: 56926520
10-14-2010 06:02 AM
NaBraniel wrote:http://maaadddog.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/aishw
arya-rai.jpg
She looks almost whiter than the blonde in the OP. I refuse to count it.
http://s.chakpak.com/se_images/24334_-1_564_none/b
-sexy-wallpaper.jpg bipasha basu,then.
hater
Reply to KillerDevdasi - Message ID#: 56941880
10-14-2010 06:55 AM
KillerDevdasi wrote:
NaBraniel wrote:http://maaadddog.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/aishw
arya-rai.jpg
She looks almost whiter than the blonde in the OP. I refuse to count it.
http://s.chakpak.com/se_images/24334_-1_564_none/b
ipasha-basu-hot
-sexy-wallpaper.jpg bipasha basu,then.
hater
Who the hell said all Indian chicks were ugly?![]()
Reply to westpark - Message ID#: 56925124
10-14-2010 08:44 AM
She honestly doesn't look Indian, even though she is part Indian. I can understand both sides of the issue here, but if there are no rules stating that the contestants have to be 100% Indian, then she should be allowed to participate.
I'm part Cherokee, yet I have no discernable Cherokee features. It would be the same as my trying to participate in events for Cherokee people.
Reply to TooncesTheCat - Message ID#: 56942366
10-14-2010 10:00 AM
Reply to SaugusHagar - Message ID#: 56942718
10-14-2010 10:22 AM
I gotcha.
Reply to SaugusHagar - Message ID#: 56942718
10-14-2010 10:27 AM
SaugusHagar wrote:
Yes and no. From a cultural perspective aesthetics have rarely been an issue for native American ceremonies, at least in my experience. Whats different here, and I think most people can see it this way even if they don't agree, is that this is a beauty contest. It's something that by its nature one is primarily judged on their aesthetic quality. If one doesn't look Indian enough even though their heritage isn't in dispute, then the winner being distinctly recognizable as being Indian is important to those wishing to promote a specific image. Their level of attractiveness is tertiary behind heritage, and looks.
the irony I suppose is that fair skin and light features are standards of beauty that are celebrated among south asians...I'm willing to bet real money that the other contestants are the whitest girls they could find.
Reply to KillerDevdasi - Message ID#: 56942864
10-14-2010 01:35 PM
so I understand you suspect that it wouldn't matter who won since they could all in some way be mistaken as quintisential caucasians?
Reply to SaugusHagar - Message ID#: 56944068
10-14-2010 01:38 PM
SaugusHagar wrote:so I understand you suspect that it wouldn't matter who won since they could all in some way be mistaken as quintisential caucasians?
yup...I'd be very surprised if a very dark skinned girl was in the competition at all.
Reply to KillerDevdasi - Message ID#: 56944088
10-14-2010 01:46 PM
unless I'm misinterpreting the motives of the contest, it sounds as though the process on it's own is self defeating.
Reply to SaugusHagar - Message ID#: 56944160
10-14-2010 02:01 PM
SaugusHagar wrote:unless I'm misinterpreting the motives of the contest, it sounds as though the process on it's own is self defeating.
ekta choudry: http://i69.in/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Ekta-Chow
shriya kishore: http://www.timescontent.com/tss/photos/preview/164
shore.jpg- miss earth semi finalist
simran kaur mundi: http://indiwo.in.com/media/images/img_81051_simran
_450x360.jpg- miss universe rep 2008
lara dutta: http://www.sizzlingcelebrity.com/wp-content/plugin
che/f1290_lara_dutta.jpg- miss universe 2000
I'm seeing a bit of a pattern, here. the darkest pageant girl I've seen was the one that came this year for miss universe...that was surprising.
Reply to KillerDevdasi - Message ID#: 56944284
10-14-2010 02:24 PM
Reply to westpark - Message ID#: 56925124
10-14-2010 02:31 PM
Reply to FieryDoom - Message ID#: 56928064
10-14-2010 03:16 PM
FieryDoom wrote:i don't care what she is, she's a hottie.
Now THAT'S what I'm talking about bro
Reply to the_shotgun_rhetoric - Message ID#: 56938680
10-14-2010 03:18 PM
the_shotgun_rhetoric wrote:Pfft, she could be f--king Inuit for all I care. I'd hit it.
This ^^
![]()
Eskimo fetishist.
![]()
Reply to westpark - Message ID#: 56925124
10-14-2010 10:20 PM - edited 10-16-2010 06:08 PM
Oh, I get it. She's too white. And people say there's no racism against white people. hehe Her mom ruined everything. D*mned mixed race breeding.
For the record, she is pretty yummy. I especially like the first pic.
TM & © 2013 Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
AdultSwim.com is part of Turner Entertainment Digital which is part of the Turner Sports & Entertainment Digital Network.