Long Post, sorry everyone but I have been thinking about a new interpretation of the final episode. Let me know your thoughts if it interests you (it starts at paragraph 3 in this post).
True, the instructors at the camp really didn't have much to offer. Brendon's instructor assumed that Brendon was an "indie" (independent) film-maker and he obviously had an axe to grind with what a lot of amatuer/independent film-makers were coming out with. And...even though he was a talentless jackass himself (a man with no credentials besides being a temporary 'gopher' for James Cameron) a decent percentage of what amatuer film students "produce" are somewhat like the films Brendon, Jason and Melissa have made.
With the example of the Camp instructors, Brendon Small (the creator) was obviously lampooning the attitudes and false credentials of many of the script-writing "gurus" that exist in Hollywood today. They're raking in cash from thousands of movie-making hopefuls, they have all the "technical knowledge" in the world but they still can't write a decent script to save their lives. The gang did want to do things their own way but they falsely assumed that-at the same time- they were also making good movies for a mass audience. At that point, they were too wrapped inside the drama of their own heads to understand that they weren't writing developed stories that an outside audience could appreciate. Much of what they were producing had significance only to themselves. In the stage of their development that HM covers, I don't think they were intending on writing and filming just for themselves, and that's why they couldn't understand why nobody "got" what they did until the very end when Brendon finally realized what they'd REALLY been doing all along and it hit him like a thunderbolt. "I don't think our movies are meant to be watched" and I believe it's Melissa who replies "then why are we making them then?"
This sounds silly, but part of me wishes that Brendon had vocalized what he was obviously thinking and said "we've just been making them for ourselves" I wonder why, assuming Brendon truly knew at that point that he, Jason, and Melissa were just acting out their wish-fulfillments on camera, why would he later have his camera in the car? Had his camera NOT been broken, would that have been enough for him to start doing film for the right reasons? because he loved it? I...don't think so, but I wonder if that could be the case. Because what if he doesn't learn anything from the camera breaking?
We assume (or at least I assume) Brendon's transformation goes in this order
1. He had the realization of what he, Jason and Melissa had been doing (acting out wish fulfillments) i.e "I don't think our movies are meant to be watched"
2. (even while knowing this he STILL decides to film in the car later that day) ...we naturally can assume that he was only filming then because he still hadn't completely broken free of the obsession the camera symbolized for him.
3. The camera breaks causing the final transformation in Brendon, which is:
4.He fully lets go of his past (and presumably lets go of film-making as well)
But to be a devil's advocate I'll put forth a different argument. Argument 2:
1. He had the Realization while watching his old movies in the room with Jason and Melissa
2. He still decides to still film later in the car that day because he now wanted now to do it out of a love for film-making rather than a neurotic obsession.
3. The camera's breaking did NOT lead to any further insights for Brendon, but ONLY symbolizes an end to his past neurosis and NOT an end to his film-making.
4. He goes on to make films with Jason and Melissa but with a new, healthier attitude.
Brendon Small's comment about "not necessarily giving up film-making just because a camera breaks" leads me to wonder if the 2nd argument I just made could be the more accurate one. There is a large difference. In Argument 1 the act of camera breaking had a direct impact on HIM, it led to his final transformation and symbolized, among other things, the end of his making film.
In argument 2, the camera breaking only had a huge impact on the AUDIENCE, it symbolized the end of HM as a series and also the end of Brendon's clinging to the past and his negative obsession with film-making, but NOT his film-making itself. In argument 2, Brendon realizes he doesn't NEED film but this doesn't mean he'll never go back to it.
To be honest...Given the tone of Season 4, the attitudes all the children were beginning to have toward their film-making etc, I still think that Argument 1 is the correct interpretation and that maybe Brendon Small just made that comment I referenced to make the viewers sad over Brendon's loss of his camera feel better.
But argument 2 could be correct. It all comes down to this:
Why was Brendon still using his camera mere hours after his Realization over why he'd been making movies? Was it because he STILL hadn't broken free of its symbolic power over him...or could it have been the start of a new, healthier, less obsessed direction in his film making?