05-08-2008 09:54 AM
The letter Q is pretty much the black sheep of the alphabet. It serves no major purpose. We don't need it.
At all.
The actual Q sound can't be sounded out in pretty much any word without sticking a "u" in front of it, and for words with Q in which there is no "u" to sound out the letter, it simply makes the "K" sound. You can basically replace Q with K in any word and it won't affect the pronounciation whatsoever. So we don't need Q. Why it even exists, I don't know.
I also noticed that the letter Q doesn't seem to exist on license plates. I've looked. We must follow their example.
DOWN WITH Q!!! ![]()
Reply to fok - Message ID#: 43931305
05-08-2008 10:10 AM
Without Q
Queen would become Kween.
Quick would become Kwik.
It looks like freaking Africa. We're more civilized than freaking Africa.
My tumblr | My last.fm | Aim: MakaBozey
Reply to fok - Message ID#: 43931305
05-08-2008 10:10 AM
cept 4qanatas airlines
they dont use a u
but i agree down w/q
Reply to fok - Message ID#: 43931305
05-08-2008 10:15 AM
Q can be found on license plates, at least in my state. and texas. and indiana. and pennsylvania.
replacing q with k doesn't give you the same sound. where qu sounds like "kw", ku would sound like "koo". of course, if you replaced qu with kw, it would work, but then you're just being mean to the lonely u. he's already abused enough with 1337, the poor little guy.
Reply to fok - Message ID#: 43931305
05-08-2008 02:21 PM
Reply to fok - Message ID#: 43931305
05-08-2008 02:29 PM
No it has a distinct consonant sound: kuick would not be pronounced the same as quick. Now the letter C is a pointless letter: cider = sider, cape = kape.
Reply to Drake6-5 - Message ID#: 43933258
05-08-2008 02:49 PM
Reply to fok - Message ID#: 43931305
05-08-2008 03:02 PM
wow, i dunno how i missed this thread.
you're absolutely wrong. Q is the the alphabet's greatest achievement. it's needed more than god. i dunno how i can convey this.
you need Q more than god.......
if you get rid of Q, you might as well scrap literacy altogether. if not life itself.
Reply to fok - Message ID#: 43931305
05-08-2008 03:11 PM
Reply to Novacane_Cowboy - Message ID#: 43933607
05-08-2008 03:12 PM
Reply to fok - Message ID#: 43931305
05-08-2008 03:30 PM
Reply to sleepyirv - Message ID#: 43933812
05-08-2008 03:43 PM
Reply to Drake6-5 - Message ID#: 43933258
05-08-2008 03:58 PM
In those cases, c is not necessary. But c is necessary when paired with h. Cuz Idunno how else you're gonna get such a sound without c...
Drake6-5 wrote:No it has a distinct consonant sound: kuick would not be pronounced the same as quick. Now the letter C is a pointless letter: cider = sider, cape = kape.
Reply to fok - Message ID#: 43931305
05-08-2008 04:07 PM
Reply to rpgamer - Message ID#: 43934108
05-08-2008 04:21 PM
Reply to harryfrodo - Message ID#: 43934346
05-08-2008 04:32 PM
Reply to rpgamer - Message ID#: 43934108
05-08-2008 05:38 PM
Easy with a k instead.
rpgamer wrote:In those cases, c is not necessary. But c is necessary when paired with h. Cuz Idunno how else you're gonna get such a sound without c...
Drake6-5 wrote:No it has a distinct consonant sound: kuick would not be pronounced the same as quick. Now the letter C is a pointless letter: cider = sider, cape = kape.
Reply to Drake6-5 - Message ID#: 43935094
05-08-2008 06:03 PM
Reply to sleepyirv - Message ID#: 43933812
05-08-2008 11:32 PM
sleepyirv wrote:
Excuse me?
I vastly prefer it when they call him Major Boothroyd or Armourer. Hell, even Algernon's better.
So yes, I'm in full agreement with this rant.
Reply to fok - Message ID#: 43931305
05-08-2008 11:45 PM
From teh Internets:
A Plan for the Improvement of English Spelling
by Unknownish or something
For example, in Year 1 that useless letter "c" would be dropped to be replased either by "k" or "s", and likewise "x" would no longer be part of the alphabet. The only kase in which "c" would be retained would be the "ch" formation, which will be dealt with later. Year 2 might reform "w" spelling, so that "which" and "one" would take the same konsonant, wile Year 3 might well abolish "y" replasing it with "i" and Iear 4 might fiks the "g/j" anomali wonse and for all. Jenerally, then, the improvement would kontinue iear bai iear with Iear 5 doing awai with useless double konsonants, and Iears 6-12 or so modifaiing vowlz and the rimeining voist and unvoist konsonants. Bai Iear 15 or sou, it wud fainali bi posibl tu meik ius ov thi ridandant letez "c", "y" and "x" -- bai now jast a memori in the maindz ov ould doderez -- tu riplais "ch", "sh", and "th" rispektivli. Fainali, xen, aafte sam 20 iers ov orxogrefkl riform, wi wud hev a lojikl, kohirnt speling in ius xrewawt xe Ingliy-spiking werld
Reply to fok - Message ID#: 43931305
05-09-2008 03:27 AM
Reply to fok - Message ID#: 43931305
05-09-2008 08:19 AM
Reply to fok - Message ID#: 43931305
05-09-2008 11:40 PM
Reply to fok - Message ID#: 43931305
05-09-2008 11:52 PM
You're gonna make me Q_Q
Reply to fok - Message ID#: 43931305
05-10-2008 12:02 AM
In Arabic, Greenlandic, Klingon, and some other languages, the letter Q is pronounced like a K at the back of the throat. ![]()
But yeah, down with Q. There's nothing you can't do with it in English (Or any other Germanic language for that matter) that can't be accomplished with a K and a W. All it is is a leftover byproduct of Latin (Also evident in the modern Romance languages of southern Europe).
TM & © 2013 Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
AdultSwim.com is part of Turner Entertainment Digital which is part of the Turner Sports & Entertainment Digital Network.