…never to happen the way it’s being approached.
Guys,
I’ve been on here a few days and one of the most discussed topics is season 3.
Seriously, what does it matter? It came to a semi-conclusion versus S1, which was a total cliffhanger. This season allowed for the viewer to run with it.
Would I shun a S3? Of course not, but what I find amusing is that nobody is really doing anything relevant to make it happen.
Is there anybody on this board that makes over six-figures post-taxes, overhead, and/or other family welfare obligations? Why not a few of us just buy the stupid rights for continuity, dump the money on Sunrise and Ban Dai and call it a day?
As many had mentioned, Turner’s not going to dish out the $$$ for a genre that is too niche, thereby working against it to render a small fan base, which leads to insignificant sales compared to comedy, which is CHEAP to produce and yields high profit margins. Objectively speaking, ANYONE with half a brain would choose the latter business model.
There is a concept of patronship that doesn’t exist anymore, which is the only way you will get a S3. By DONATING the calculated averaged production cost of S1 & S2, called “x,” to the good people who brought you the Big-O and expecting no returns (hence donation) will anything ever happen.
Don’t expect Turner or anyone else in business to somehow agree to throw money away.
This is now a matter of principle and—as difficult as it may be for many to comprehend—profiting has to take the back seat.
So, the first thing to do is find out how much the budget and actual costs for producing S1 (cel) & S2 (digital), considering inflation.
Buying the rights is the easy part, and it will be even easier when you’re basically donating money to resuscitate an indefinitely suspended project.
It really isn’t THAT difficult. Money makes things happen. The other element that would make this VERY feasible is the Japanese culture, which is highly collectivistic. So when you take that inherent passion of a culture and add to it the passion of an artist (in the broadest sense of the word, e.g. writers, animators, and the entire staff that made the Big-O happen in the first place), you get things moving.
All it takes is sincere intent, and when you slam this on anybody, they know you’re serious.
There you have it, that’s how you get S3 -- no crappy petition attempts, no whining, no hoping, no depending on a group of businessmen who are seeking profitable products. Do it yourself.
And to those that want to entertain the idea of making the Big-O a profitable product, all I say is good luck. As previously mentioned, you can’t make everybody enjoy a detective-mystery show with a splash of mecha; therefore, it will not reach the success of its cousin, BtAS.
The biggest blunder of the marketing group that dreamt up Big-O was the name itself, since it’s most commonly associated with the female **pOp**, though I prefer it over “The Incredible Adventures of Roger & Pals.”
If, however, it is possible to make it profitable, I encourage you to draft a convincing business plan, based upon empirical evidence and pitch it to Turner/CN. The patronship principle still applies. If pitched to Turner, it would make the project more appealing if you bowed out expecting zero compensation. On a side note, you don’t HAVE to go to Turner; you can always pitch elsewhere. Consider, too, that it took Haim Saban 8 years of pitching before FOX green-lighted the Mighty Morphin Power Rangers (he’s a billionaire now btw).
So, to recap:
1. Find out the budget & actual costs for S1 & S2
2. Fundraise to meet that budget with a 25% hedge to avoid depletion, which would not only prevent S3 from not being made, but a lot of money lost in the process
a. Consider that a good portion of a project’s budget includes marketing, e.g. print, television, promotional products, etc.
b. Because we’re “funding” it, they have nothing to recoup. The only thing lost to them is opportunity cost of what other project they could be working on in the meantime and the possible ROI from it
i. Best case scenario, it will be cheaper because we don’t budget for marketing at all since the producers aren’t vested, though unlikely since that would imply that should the producers attempt a marketing campaign to generate sales, it would be out of their pocket. The aforementioned lost opportunity cost would further make it less worthwhile for producers to pursue since they could be focusing on another, profitable venture (no marketing = no sales).
ii. Expected scenario is that we fund marketing and allow all profits to go directly to the production company, e.g. we, the benefactors, take NOTHING out of it except the satisfaction of admiring our efforts in the finished product of S3, just like the Medici’s
3. Get the rights for continuity only (if we even need them at this point), and allow the production companies earn 100% of any net revenue, as stated in step 2, which will sweeten the deal for them, thereby giving them the greatest incentive to move forward to begin with.
a. Consider that the producers would be foolish to pass up the opportunity to accept a donation which will realize profit since, in their eyes, the product was “free” due to our contributions. Purely discussing this, the cost-benefit analysis would come down to net revenue less taxes paid on contributions/monetary “gifts,” which is classified as “additional income.”
I’m beginning my first year of law school in Fall 2010, concentrating on entertainment.
When I graduate in 2014 and assuming that there are some affluent people on the boards that for some reason didn’t take off with this, I propose we get together, put our money where our mouth is, set up some meetings with the production companies in Japan, go there with an interpreter, and leave with S3 in the works. It’s been so long since S2, what’s 3-4 more years, right?
Like I said, it’s not THAT difficult.
Admittedly, this would, however, be an ENTIRELY different discussion if we assumed the role of investors (not patron), thereby changing the dynamic to profit-making, which would require advanced knowledge of entertainment contract negotiations, copyrights, intellectual rights, etc, not to mention production project management.
The way I see it, give them the $$$ and tell them to do it just like before.
I must address that the term “donate” is used loosely throughout this proposal. I am not implying that if Sunrise and the other guys blow the money, there won’t be any consequence. The fact is the money is given assuming certain conditions are met:
1) Try as hard as possible to reassemble the same people behind S1 & S2,
2) S3 is completed within the episode requirement agreed upon (most likely 13 eps, since 26 would possibly be too expensive). There is a possibility that cranking out an additional 13 episodes may not be too much more, who knows?! The point is, we want a S3 to tie up loose ends, and it would be in their best interest to just wrap it up versus sit around for another group of rabid fans to dump a wad of cash on them and bail them out
I’ve written this mess in one fell swoop, so I apologize for any redundancies or incoherent rants.
I’m as passionate as the next guy—possibly more so—about this show, and it’s just aggravating to see such a display of passive-aggressiveness.
If you know how to talk to the right people, this is a feasible objective. The questions is: is there anyone who will join in to make it happen? If not, then you—and only you, who have the means, but steer away from making it possible—are to blame.
So please, stop hassling Turner/CN, Ban-Dai, and Sunrise. Their hands are tied, and your petty, persistent, unfounded, empty requests will continue to go unread.
- No Side -
CAST IN THE NAME OF GOD -- YE NOT GUILTY