This statement is lolable.
This is because the humour from each office is not at all a copy of the other. Two separate types to be honest.
The american version of the office is my favorite, and I find it hard to get into the British office, but not because it is a bad show. I think both shows are equally as brilliant but in their own way. American humour is made of ridiculous and far fetched situations and revolves around conflicting personality types. British humour is very wordy and the majority of their humour is just a play on words and for good reason seeing as how the British pioneered the science of words.
I believe the setting that the British version takes place in is a lot more realistic, and works well for the Brits.
But in the American version, the office count was decreased to not only get a better view of conflicting personality types but to also cultivate the "homey" feel that a person starts to build with the show after watching it and learning of all the characters quirks and traits. Traits that are not only introduced into the show, but kept to build a characters identity.
I don't know about the British version, but the american version tries to take aspects from the actors' lives to further increase not only the feel of the character but how natural it is to play the character.
Example: Steve Carrel (sp?) loves the restaurant Chili's in real life, so they included that in one of his traits. Whenever he takes a client out to dinner, it is his restaurant of choice. Steve likes it, so his character does as well.
Message Edited by PainfullyOptimistic on 12-31-2009 02:47 AM
Too many typos to ignore.
Message Edited by PainfullyOptimistic on 12-31-2009 02:51 AM
I was a landscape in your dream and all my mountains were on fire.